Comparison
Tradeify vs MyFundedFutures
Two EOD trailing drawdown firms at a similar price point — but with very different stances on consistency rules, payout splits, and daily loss enforcement. Here's the breakdown for Pine Script traders.
Rule-by-rule comparison — 50k accounts
| Rule | Tradeify 50k (Growth) | MyFundedFutures 50k |
|---|---|---|
| Profit target | $3,000 | $3,000 |
| Max trailing drawdown | $2,500 | $2,500 |
| Drawdown type | Trailing EOD | Trailing EOD |
| Consistency rule | None (Growth path) | Yes — 30% of best day |
| Daily loss limit | None (soft guidance) | $1,500 (hard) |
| Min trading days | 1 day | 5 days |
| Automation allowed | Yes | Yes |
| Overnight holds | Permitted | Permitted |
| News trading | Allowed | Allowed |
| Payout split | 90% | 85% |
| Eval fee (50k) | ~$150–$175 | ~$140 |
| Reset cost | ~$100–$120 | ~$80 |
| Best for | Variance-prone scripts, fast eval, higher payout | Budget-conscious traders, steady daily grinders |
What each rule difference means for Pine Scripts
Consistency rule: the biggest dividing line
MyFundedFutures enforces a 30% consistency rule across the evaluation period. If your Pine Script captures a large move — for example, $1,500 in a single CPI session — and that day represents more than 30% of your total accumulated profit, MFFU can flag the evaluation as non-compliant even if the profit target is reached. Traders either need to cap daily targets in the script to avoid this, or accept the risk on volatile days.
Tradeify Growth has no consistency rule. A script can generate all of its $3,000 target in a single high-momentum session and pass cleanly. This is the defining advantage of the Growth path for algorithmic traders running momentum or breakout strategies that naturally have lumpy P&L distributions.
Daily loss limit: enforcement difference matters
MFFU enforces a hard $1,500 daily loss limit — when hit, the broker risk system stops new orders. Every Pine Script on MFFU needs a daily kill switch that monitors intraday P&L and halts trading when the -$1,500 level is approaching. Tradeify Growth operates with a soft daily guidance figure rather than a hard platform cutoff, giving scripts more room to run during high-volatility sessions without requiring a precisely tuned intraday floor check.
Minimum trading days: Tradeify enables faster cycling
MyFundedFutures requires 5 trading days on the evaluation — your script must trade across at least 5 sessions before a payout is processed. Tradeify Growth requires just 1 day, enabling the fastest possible evaluation cycle. For traders running multiple accounts simultaneously or targeting rapid eval completion during ideal market conditions, Tradeify's minimum is a meaningful operational advantage.
Payout split: 5 percentage points that compound
Tradeify pays 90% of profits. MyFundedFutures pays 85%. On a $3,000 payout, the difference is $150. On a $10,000 funded-account month, it's $500. The gap compounds across multiple payout cycles — traders who plan to run funded accounts for extended periods will accumulate a meaningful difference in retained earnings over time favoring Tradeify.
Eval cost: MFFU wins on price
MyFundedFutures runs eval fees around $140 on a 50k account and resets around $80 — among the lowest of any major prop firm. Tradeify runs $150–$175 with resets around $100–$120. For traders who anticipate multiple attempts or use a high-volume eval-retry strategy, MFFU's lower cost per attempt makes a real difference in overall profitability math.
Which firm should you choose?
Your script has variance or concentrated profits
- No consistency rule — windfall sessions are fine
- No hard daily loss limit — bot runs freely all session
- Better payout split: 90% vs 85%
- Can complete eval in as little as 1 day
- Momentum, breakout, or news-adjacent strategies
You want the lowest cost per attempt
- Cheapest eval fees (~$140) and resets (~$80) in the industry
- Strategy already runs within consistent daily P&L bands
- $2,500 drawdown room — same as Tradeify
- EOD trailing DD — same mechanic as Tradeify
- Scaling program available for funded accounts
The verdict: rule flexibility vs cost efficiency
Tradeify Growth and MyFundedFutures are actually quite similar in structure — both use EOD trailing drawdown and $2,500 max drawdown on a 50k account. The divergence is on three axes: consistency rule, daily loss enforcement, and payout split. Tradeify wins all three on rule flexibility. MFFU wins on cost per attempt.
If you're running a systematic Pine Script strategy with variable daily output and want the most lenient rules, Tradeify Growth is the better fit. If you're running a steady, consistent strategy and want to minimize eval spend over multiple attempts, MFFU's lower price makes it the more efficient vehicle.
FAQ
Does Tradeify or MyFundedFutures have a consistency rule?
MyFundedFutures has a 30% consistency rule — no single day can represent more than 30% of total profits. Tradeify Growth has no consistency rule. For momentum-based scripts that produce concentrated profits on high-opportunity sessions, Tradeify Growth is significantly more lenient.
Which firm has a better payout — Tradeify or MFFU?
Tradeify pays 90%. MyFundedFutures pays 85%. The 5-point difference becomes meaningful over multiple payouts — $500 per $10,000 payout cycle. Tradeify wins on split.
Is MyFundedFutures or Tradeify cheaper to start?
MFFU is cheaper — around $140 for a 50k eval vs $150–$175 for Tradeify, plus MFFU's ~$80 reset cost is the lowest of any major firm. For traders cycling through multiple attempts, MFFU's lower cost per attempt is a real operational advantage.
Scripts built for both Tradeify and MFFU rule sets.
Consistency cap logic, daily kill switch parameters, and EOD drawdown sizing — all configurable per firm at checkout.
View Plans Check Strategy Readiness