Comparison
Tradeify vs MyFundedFutures
A similar price point but two different drawdown mechanics — Tradeify's floor trails at end-of-day, MFFU's never moves at all — plus different stances on daily loss enforcement and payout splits. Here's the breakdown for Pine Script traders.
Rule-by-rule comparison — 50k accounts
| Rule | Tradeify 50k (Growth) | MyFundedFutures 50k |
|---|---|---|
| Profit target | $3,000 | $3,000 |
| Max trailing drawdown | $2,000 | $2,000 (static) |
| Drawdown type | EOD trailing | Static |
| Consistency rule | None (Growth path) | None |
| Daily loss limit | None (soft guidance) | $1,250 |
| Min trading days | 1 day | None |
| Automation allowed | Yes | Yes |
| Overnight holds | Permitted | Permitted |
| News trading | Allowed | Allowed |
| Payout split | 90% | 85% |
| Eval fee (50k) | ~$150–$175 | ~$140 |
| Reset cost | ~$100–$120 | ~$80 |
| Best for | Variance-prone scripts, fast eval, higher payout | Budget-conscious traders, steady daily grinders |
What each rule difference means for Pine Scripts
Consistency rule: not actually a differentiator here
Neither firm has a percentage-based consistency rule on the plans compared here. MyFundedFutures has none at all. Tradeify Growth has none either (Tradeify Select, a separate plan, caps a single day at 40% of total profit). A Pine Script that captures all of its $3,000 target in a single high-momentum session passes cleanly on either firm — the real dividing line is drawdown type and daily loss enforcement, covered next.
Daily loss limit: enforcement difference matters
MFFU enforces a hard $1,250 daily loss limit on a 50k account — when hit, the broker risk system stops new orders. Every Pine Script on MFFU needs a daily kill switch that monitors intraday P&L and halts trading when the -$1,250 level is approaching. Tradeify Growth operates with a soft daily guidance figure rather than a hard platform cutoff, giving scripts more room to run during high-volatility sessions without requiring a precisely tuned intraday floor check.
Minimum trading days: Tradeify enables faster cycling
MyFundedFutures has no minimum trading-day requirement. Tradeify Growth requires 1 day. Both are effectively immediate — neither imposes a meaningful day-count floor on how fast a Pine Script strategy can complete the evaluation.
Payout split: 5 percentage points that compound
Tradeify pays 90% of profits. MyFundedFutures pays 85%. On a $3,000 payout, the difference is $150. On a $10,000 funded-account month, it's $500. The gap compounds across multiple payout cycles — traders who plan to run funded accounts for extended periods will accumulate a meaningful difference in retained earnings over time favoring Tradeify.
Eval cost: MFFU wins on price
MyFundedFutures runs eval fees around $140 on a 50k account and resets around $80 — among the lowest of any major prop firm. Tradeify runs $150–$175 with resets around $100–$120. For traders who anticipate multiple attempts or use a high-volume eval-retry strategy, MFFU's lower cost per attempt makes a real difference in overall profitability math.
Which firm should you choose?
Your script has variance or concentrated profits
- No consistency rule — windfall sessions are fine
- No hard daily loss limit — bot runs freely all session
- Better payout split: 90% vs 85%
- Can complete eval in as little as 1 day
- Momentum, breakout, or news-adjacent strategies
You want the lowest cost per attempt
- Cheapest eval fees (~$140) and resets (~$80) in the industry
- Strategy already runs within consistent daily P&L bands
- $2,000 drawdown room — same as Tradeify
- Static drawdown — the floor never moves, unlike Tradeify's EOD trailing
- Scaling program available for funded accounts
The verdict: rule flexibility vs cost efficiency
Tradeify Growth and MyFundedFutures both give you $2,000 of drawdown room on a 50k account and neither has a percentage-based consistency rule, but they get there differently: Tradeify's floor trails at end-of-day while MFFU's never moves at all, and MFFU enforces a hard $1,250 daily loss limit where Tradeify's is soft guidance. Tradeify wins on daily-loss flexibility and payout split. MFFU wins on cost per attempt and a floor that never rises against you.
If you're running a systematic Pine Script strategy with variable daily output and want the most lenient rules, Tradeify Growth is the better fit. If you're running a steady, consistent strategy and want to minimize eval spend over multiple attempts, MFFU's lower price makes it the more efficient vehicle.
FAQ
Does Tradeify or MyFundedFutures have a consistency rule?
Neither does, on the plans compared here. MyFundedFutures has no percentage-based consistency rule. Tradeify Growth also has none (Tradeify Select, a separate plan, caps a single day at 40%). The real differentiator between the two is drawdown type and daily loss enforcement.
Which firm has a better payout — Tradeify or MFFU?
Tradeify pays 90%. MyFundedFutures pays 85%. The 5-point difference becomes meaningful over multiple payouts — $500 per $10,000 payout cycle. Tradeify wins on split.
Is MyFundedFutures or Tradeify cheaper to start?
MFFU is cheaper — around $140 for a 50k eval vs $150–$175 for Tradeify, plus MFFU's ~$80 reset cost is the lowest of any major firm. For traders cycling through multiple attempts, MFFU's lower cost per attempt is a real operational advantage.
Scripts built for both Tradeify and MFFU rule sets.
Consistency cap logic, daily kill switch parameters, and EOD drawdown sizing — all configurable per firm at checkout.
View Plans Check Strategy Readiness